Certain sections of society are of opinion that it is not ethical to put away animals in zoo and rest have an opposite perspective that their presence there is vital to ecology and entertainment. This essay will discuss both viewpoints with relevant examples.

On the one side, there is ample evidence that it is a grave misdeed to hold animals in confined public spaces. The central reason for this is two-fold, it is unjust to withhold creatures for entertainment of human beings. Exhibiting them to general population to generate revenue is borderline cruelty. , it is an artificial habitat and could hamper their instincts to hunt which leads to ecological imbalance. , loss of major predators in the largest forest of the world, Amazon has animal population to surge, crippling growth of young tress and reducing biodiversity.

Although there is a case for zoo's impacting species diversity and promoting inhumane treatment towards them, benefits that from it cannot . This is it is the space where conservation of endangered breeds is possible. Creatures which pose threat of being extinct and increased by nourishing and enabling them to reproduce. , wildlife parks create hundreds of employment opportunities to local population. This drives local economy and the money raided can for conservation projects.

, it is unethical to cage animals for amusement of public and has ripple effect on the ecosystem. , it aids to preserve endangered species and generate revenue by providing jobs to localities.